Big Science is Not Objective

Life is not easy, but it is a lot simpler than many would have us believe. Here are a few simple (but not simplistic) thoughts for us to chew on:

• God is our Creator and He created the world in six days.
• Jesus is our Savior if we repent of our sins and call on Him as our Lord.
• Liberty is better than oppression, and oppression largely comes from the hands of people using government as a means to increase their power, prestige, and/or wealth.
• The earth’s atmosphere generally gets warmer and cooler based on how hot the sun is (go figure!), and it has been following this cycle long before man learned to harness fossil fuels.

But leave it to experts to make these a lot more complex than need be. That is the case whether they are experts on theology or science.

Here’s a bit on the science angle from David Coppedge:

So much for objectivity. Take any social cause that is politically correct, and you can count on Big Science to endorse it, and to condemn the Christian or conservative view.

There’s something people need to know about science in the 21st century: it has become deeply politicized. In a recent post (20 June 2018), Dr Jerry Bergman related how lopsided the science faculty are in academia, with Democrats outnumbering Republicans in overwhelming numbers (sometimes 100%). Only the naive would think this kind of culture would never influence their scientific papers and theories. The further a study gets from observable, repeatable, testable matters, the more it is likely to reflect—not steer—the political ideology of its cultural milieu. In each of the following news stories, so-called scientific experts always take the leftist position—even when it intuitively contradicts expectations that Darwinism—which they hold to religiously—would intuit.

Read the rest of Coppedge’s article here.